
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 4:47 am Post subject: Knurling differences between Curta Type I & II
Hi fellow Curta enthusiasts,
New to the board here -- so a hello to all.
General interest observation: As we know, the knurling pattern differs from Type I vs. Type II.
Ultimately, on Type I Curtas, the black anodized coating on the knurling leads to undue wear from removal and insertion into the metal canister. (Not sure if this was as prevalent when plastic canisters became the standard.)
Type II knurling, with flattened (exposed metal) "crests", makes for less noticeable wear over time. Again, I'm not sure if this is a moot point once plastic canisters became standard.
So I suppose I'm wondering why the continued difference? Was it with intentions to distinguish the two types? I figure the (eventual) textured grey body and alternating red/black setting register sliders would've sufficed from a marketing standpoint.
I realize early Type II Curtas were quite similar in appearance to the Type I Curtas. (I have read the texture was added to the body for added gripping capability.)
But once they realized the black anodized knurling on Type I Curtas would inevitably become worn, why not change it to be more like the grey body Type II Curtas? (And maybe even texture the body like the Type II Curtas -- yet keep it black.)
I know ... it's ultimately cosmetics -- and has nothing to do with function -- but I'm just curious.
-CurtaGuy
P.S. Apologies if my metalworking terms aren't technically correct. Not exactly sure what to call the high points of the knurls
